Search for images with Imagery
Search for images? Certainly you use Google Image Search (GIS)! Why? Because this tool to utilize the power of Google search and most comprehensive, more choices for you to find a more optimal image. Really so many people do not remember a time other tools, including Imagery-a search engine online photo new and wonderful.
You try at: http://elzr.com/imagery Say the word "great" is not used for listening and seem to have this tool on the clouds. Indeed, but if you use it, you'll certainly think the use of GIS or Imagery. In fact there is not much "difference" compared to the GIS as statements of Imagery, but enough to make you feel like. When you point the mouse on an image from search results, a pop-up will appear on the summary information such as name, width, height, size and path of the image url that. Corresponding to each image is shown in the full-size, you are equipped with the interactive tools include: zoom in, zoom out, go back to standard size original 1:1, view source, showing image in a new window, close the image.
Some key features of Imagery: * The interaction completely new. * Features search by filtering by method: size, color and format image files. * Preview information about the image before opening them. * Zoom in many ways to help get the best vision. * Setting put images on a layout page. * Only compatible with Firefox (a Nhược of Imagery). * Similarly system Google Image Ripper. As declared emphasis is replaced iDark GIS should try Imagery with Firefox. Results also very spectacular. iDark type from the U.S. It does not have quotation marks in both Imagery and GIS, GIS's results for the 330,000 results, and Imagery to 410,000 results more-GIS. Vietnamese text with the GIS 23,300,000 results while Imagery 28200000 to have results. Imagery is clearly found more results than GIS! Time is by feel, first search the Imagery GIS but slower than type 2 second faster than the Imagery necessarily.
Go interface is quite simple Imagery. Interface to the original seem rather ... bad. This difference is each time a search for the keyword is different Imagery will present results on a different tab. This tab is right on your page and not a different Firefox tab. This is really convenient and easy change-over to create a big difference compared to GIS. Imagery unfortunately not supported to find images in a domain name and does not have features Face recognition, line ... as the advanced functionality of GIS. Only every English, do not support other languages is also lost by U.S. Imagery! Imagery such as iDark the complete match with Google. If improvements are little more than Google is out to say. But overcome Google user or not is not to be an early one afternoon. And while Google always know how to "treat" with how your competitor!
You try at: http://elzr.com/imagery Say the word "great" is not used for listening and seem to have this tool on the clouds. Indeed, but if you use it, you'll certainly think the use of GIS or Imagery. In fact there is not much "difference" compared to the GIS as statements of Imagery, but enough to make you feel like. When you point the mouse on an image from search results, a pop-up will appear on the summary information such as name, width, height, size and path of the image url that. Corresponding to each image is shown in the full-size, you are equipped with the interactive tools include: zoom in, zoom out, go back to standard size original 1:1, view source, showing image in a new window, close the image.
Some key features of Imagery: * The interaction completely new. * Features search by filtering by method: size, color and format image files. * Preview information about the image before opening them. * Zoom in many ways to help get the best vision. * Setting put images on a layout page. * Only compatible with Firefox (a Nhược of Imagery). * Similarly system Google Image Ripper. As declared emphasis is replaced iDark GIS should try Imagery with Firefox. Results also very spectacular. iDark type from the U.S. It does not have quotation marks in both Imagery and GIS, GIS's results for the 330,000 results, and Imagery to 410,000 results more-GIS. Vietnamese text with the GIS 23,300,000 results while Imagery 28200000 to have results. Imagery is clearly found more results than GIS! Time is by feel, first search the Imagery GIS but slower than type 2 second faster than the Imagery necessarily.
Go interface is quite simple Imagery. Interface to the original seem rather ... bad. This difference is each time a search for the keyword is different Imagery will present results on a different tab. This tab is right on your page and not a different Firefox tab. This is really convenient and easy change-over to create a big difference compared to GIS. Imagery unfortunately not supported to find images in a domain name and does not have features Face recognition, line ... as the advanced functionality of GIS. Only every English, do not support other languages is also lost by U.S. Imagery! Imagery such as iDark the complete match with Google. If improvements are little more than Google is out to say. But overcome Google user or not is not to be an early one afternoon. And while Google always know how to "treat" with how your competitor!
Bài đăng
